3.5 Examination team input into the scenario development
Latest Releases
•
1m 14s
Andy Murray, the Lead Editor of PRINCE2 V7, discussed feedback received during the development of the PRINCE2 V7. Referring to earlier comments by Scott, Murray emphasized the importance of consistency in the presented scenarios. One significant piece of feedback received from the exams team pertained to the original ambiguity of the project scenarios in terms of their current position in the project lifecycle. For examination purposes, it was crucial for the scenarios to clearly indicate the current phase of the project, whether it's in the initiation, delivery, or another stage. To address this, the exam team recommended that each scenario should not only provide an outline of the project plan but also explicitly state its position in the lifecycle. This change ensures clarity for those taking the exam and prevents potential misunderstandings.
Up Next in Latest Releases
-
3.1 How scenarios in PRINCE2 V7 are u...
Andy Murray, the Lead Editor of PRINCE2 V7, shared insights on the thought process behind structuring the manual. A significant concern during its development was the concept of "cognitive load", which refers to the total amount of mental effort being used in working memory. The team was aware th...